Defense & Drones Supercycle: Military spending is no longer just “more tanks and jets.” The fastest-growing checks are flowing into software-defined war: cyber defense, cheap autonomous drones, counter-drone systems, electronic warfare, and resilient space networks that keep everything connected when GPS and comms get jammed.
Here’s the key shift: modern conflict is turning into an industrial-scale sensor + drone + data contest. If you can see first, jam first, and strike with low-cost autonomous systems, you don’t need to outspend the enemy on a per-platform basis—you outproduce and out-adapt them. That’s why investors keep hearing the same words in procurement updates: attritable, autonomous, resilient, rapid fielding, commercial speed.
This is what a “supercycle” looks like in defense: not one big headline contract, but multi-year layering of programs across NATO rearmament, Indo-Pacific deterrence, and lessons imported from real battlefields where drones, jammers, satellites, and cyber attacks are constant. The winners aren’t only the old prime contractors. The real alpha is understanding where the spending is migrating—and which public companies are positioned in each lane.
1) Why this is a supercycle (and not a one-off spike)
Defense budgets can surge for a year and then fade. This cycle looks different because it’s being reinforced by multiple forces at once:
- Structural rearmament: Europe is rebuilding inventories and expanding production capacity after years of underinvestment.
- Indo-Pacific deterrence: The U.S. and allies are pushing new capabilities to complicate a high-end conflict scenario—especially massed drones and distributed sensors.
- Battlefield learning loop: Drones, EW, and counter-UAS are evolving monthly, not annually. Procurement is shifting toward faster iteration.
- Space as critical infrastructure: Space isn’t “science”; it’s now core military plumbing—ISR, missile warning, comms, navigation, and targeting.
- Cyber as a permanent front: Attacks don’t require troop movements. Cyber is always on, always escalating, and constantly funded.
Translation for investors: the defense opportunity is expanding beyond classic “platform primes” into a broad defense-tech stack. Think of it like the cloud era: hardware mattered, but the real compounding winners built the platforms, software, and ecosystems.
2) Where the real spending is going: three high-growth pockets
A) Cyber: the “always-funded” battlefield
Cyber budgets behave differently from aircraft programs. They’re less lumpy, less politically visible, and easier to expand quietly. And cyber spending isn’t just “buy security software.” It’s a full ecosystem: identity, endpoint, cloud workload protection, zero trust, threat intel, incident response, secure networking, and resilience.
What’s driving spend:
- Zero Trust rollouts across governments and defense suppliers
- Cloud migration of sensitive workloads (which requires stronger controls)
- Supply-chain attacks pushing procurement toward vendor risk management
- AI-powered attacks raising the baseline for detection and response
Public companies that benefit (examples):
- Palo Alto Networks (PANW) – platform approach across network + cloud + SOC
- CrowdStrike (CRWD) – endpoint + identity + threat intel flywheel
- Fortinet (FTNT) – secure networking at scale, attractive in budget-focused environments
- Zscaler (ZS) – zero trust access and cloud security posture
- Cloudflare (NET) – network security and edge services, increasingly relevant to resilience
- Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) / Leidos (LDOS) / CACI (CACI) – services-heavy exposure to federal cyber modernization
Investor logic: Cyber is the “picks and shovels” layer that keeps getting refilled. Even if one program slows, the threat environment doesn’t. In a supercycle, cyber winners often compound because they become embedded in workflows and compliance frameworks.
B) Drones: from “nice-to-have” to mass production
Traditional defense procurement optimized for high performance, low volume. Drones flip that: good enough, high volume. The point is not to make one exquisite aircraft—it’s to field thousands of cheap systems that can scout, jam, decoy, strike, and absorb losses.
That’s why programs emphasizing attritable autonomous systems and rapid delivery matter so much. If the doctrine becomes “multiple thousands,” the market size changes. A drone supercycle is less like aerospace and more like industrial production + software updates.
Where the money clusters:
- Small UAS and loitering munitions (recon + strike)
- Counter-UAS (detect, track, jam, neutralize)
- Autonomy + mission software (navigation in jammed environments, swarm coordination, targeting)
- Electronic warfare (jammers, sensors, spectrum dominance)
Public companies that benefit (examples):
- AeroVironment (AVAV) – established in small drones and loitering systems
- Kratos (KTOS) – attritable platforms and defense-tech orientation
- Teledyne (TDY) – sensors, imaging, components used across unmanned systems
- RTX (RTX) / Northrop Grumman (NOC) / L3Harris (LHX) – electronic warfare, sensors, integrated systems
- Trimble (TRMB) (positioning) and select component suppliers – indirect beneficiaries as navigation becomes harder in contested environments
C) Space: resilient networks, missile warning, and “military broadband”
Space is where defense begins to resemble a tech infrastructure buildout. The trend is toward proliferated low-earth-orbit constellations: many smaller satellites, refreshed frequently, harder to disable, and cheaper to replace. The objective is resilience and refresh speed, not perfect satellites that last 15 years.
Where the money clusters:
- Missile warning / tracking (especially against fast and maneuvering threats)
- ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) and targeting support
- Secure communications and protected waveforms
- Launch + satellite manufacturing + ground systems
Public companies that benefit (examples):
- Lockheed Martin (LMT) – deep space + missile defense + satellite programs
- Northrop Grumman (NOC) – space systems + strategic programs
- L3Harris (LHX) – payloads, sensors, ISR, and space communications
- Rocket Lab (RKLB) – launch + space systems exposure (higher risk, higher upside)
- Iridium (IRDM) / Viasat (VSAT) – satellite communications ecosystem (each with different risk profiles)
Investor logic: Space spending often comes with long program timelines, but once a constellation architecture is chosen, the refresh cadence can create a recurring demand cycle—more like “infrastructure subscriptions” than one-and-done capex.
3) The company map: “primes” vs “enablers” vs “speculative disruptors”
Bucket 1: Defense primes (cash-flow compounding)
If you want the lowest drama exposure to the supercycle, the primes still matter. They are the system integrators, they own the relationships, and they often collect the margin on complexity.
- Lockheed Martin (LMT) – missiles, space, and high-end programs
- RTX (RTX) – air defense, sensors, propulsion, and large installed base
- Northrop Grumman (NOC) – strategic + space + advanced systems
- General Dynamics (GD) – land systems + marine + stable defense mix
- BAE Systems (BAESY) – strong European exposure and broad portfolio
How primes win in the new era: by acquiring or partnering with fast-moving defense tech, bundling it into larger contracts, and scaling production once a concept becomes doctrine.
Bucket 2: Enablers (the “defense tech stack”)
These are the companies that sell components, sensors, software, and services that plug into multiple programs. Enablers can be underrated because they don’t look like “defense,” but they benefit from broad-based modernization.
- Leidos (LDOS), BAH, CACI – IT modernization, analytics, cyber, mission support
- Teledyne (TDY) – sensors and imaging across autonomous and ISR use cases
- Palantir (PLTR) – data integration and decision support (benefits if software becomes more central to defense)
How enablers win: by becoming “standard equipment” across many contracts, not just one.
Bucket 3: Speculative disruptors (high risk, high upside)
This is where drones, counter-UAS, and space manufacturing can create asymmetric outcomes. But you must treat these like venture-style public equities: position sizing matters.
- Rocket Lab (RKLB) – launch + space systems
- Planet Labs (PL) – earth observation and imagery analytics (execution-dependent)
- Ondas Holdings (ONDS) – counter-UAS and autonomous drone systems exposure (microcap risk)
4) Spotlight: Ondas Holdings (ONDS) — why it’s relevant (and why it’s risky)
ONDS is a speculative way to play two themes that are exploding in priority: autonomous drones and counter-drone defense. Through its subsidiaries (including American Robotics and Airobotics), Ondas has positioned around automated drone operations and counter-UAS offerings such as the Iron Drone Raider system (marketed for defense, homeland security, and critical infrastructure protection).
Why it fits the supercycle: counter-UAS has become a “must-buy” category. Airports, ports, utilities, stadiums, and military bases all face the same problem: drones are cheap and accessible; defending against them must be reliable and continuous. That creates a recurring demand profile: detection, classification, and neutralization (often tied to ongoing support and upgrades).
Why it’s high risk: microcaps can be volatile, funding-dependent, and sensitive to contract timing. Unlike primes, they don’t have decades of backlog and balance-sheet strength. If you include ONDS at all, it’s typically as a small satellite position—not a core holding.
5) Don’t ignore “counter-drone” and electronic warfare (EW)
If drones are the offense, counter-UAS and EW are the defense—and both can scale fast. Counter-UAS isn’t one product; it’s a layered stack:
- Sensing: radar, RF detection, electro-optical/infrared
- Identification: classification and threat scoring
- Defeat: jamming, spoofing, kinetic intercept, directed energy
- Command and control: fusing signals into a single operational picture
That’s why big integrators can win (they bundle layers), and why specialists can win (they own a critical piece that becomes the standard). Investors should watch this category as closely as drones themselves.
6) The bond angle: how to invest in the supercycle without equity volatility
Most people think “defense investing = stocks.” But the supercycle can also show up in credit, especially for large contractors with durable cash flows, long contract visibility, and historically low default risk.
How bonds fit:
- Defense primes often issue investment-grade bonds backed by diversified revenue and long-duration programs.
- Credit can smooth the ride if you want exposure to stable defense cash flows without full equity drawdowns.
- Duration matters: if rates stay volatile, shorter-duration IG bonds can reduce interest-rate risk.
Practical ways to express the bond view (non-exhaustive):
- Broad IG corporate bond ETFs (diversified, simple) as a “sleep-at-night” base.
- Short-duration IG bond ETFs if you want less sensitivity to rate moves.
- Individual bonds from defense primes if you can access them efficiently and understand the risks.
Important: bonds are not risk-free. If yields rise, longer-duration bonds can fall. If a company is overlevered, credit spreads can widen. The right bond exposure is usually about risk management, not chasing returns.
7) A simple “no-gambling” framework to approach this theme
If you’re building a long-term portfolio (not trading headlines), think in layers:
- Core (stability): diversified index funds + a modest allocation to defense primes
- Satellite (growth): select cyber and space names with strong fundamentals
- Speculative (optional): small position in high-upside disruptors like drones/counter-UAS microcaps
- Defense for your portfolio: IG bonds (or short-duration IG) to reduce overall volatility
In a supercycle, the biggest mistake is overfitting to one “hot” ticker. The second biggest mistake is using leverage. The smarter play is to own a diversified set of beneficiaries across cyber + drones + space and let the multi-year spending trend do the work.
8) What to watch next (catalysts)
- Procurement language: “multiple thousands,” “attritable,” “rapid fielding,” and “commercial speed” are the tells
- Counter-UAS funding: airports, critical infrastructure, and homeland security budgets
- Space architecture awards: proliferated constellations, missile warning, and ground systems
- Cyber mandates: compliance frameworks that force spending (and lock in vendors)
- Production capacity expansions: the market rewards manufacturers who can actually deliver at scale
Bottom line: The defense supercycle is evolving into a technology infrastructure buildout. The clearest beneficiaries sit at the intersection of autonomy, cyber resilience, and space-based sensing. If you position across those lanes—while using bonds to control volatility—you can participate without turning your portfolio into a roller coaster.
For more investing frameworks and anti-gambling strategy posts, browse: https://investnotbet.com/all-my-posts/
External references:
1) SIPRI – Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2024:
link
2) U.S. Defense Innovation Unit – Replicator Initiative:
link
Leave a Reply